MiCA CASP Passport in Practice 2026 — Operational Use Realities
CASP passport under MiCA Article 65 has been operational since late 2024. By mid-2026 cross-border passport activity is established but oper…
ana-petrova ·Crypto Law Index — CLPAI 2026.1
Crypto licensing law firms · CLPAI 2026.1
The editorial ranking of 13 crypto licensing law firms and consultancies handling MiCA CASP authorisation across the EU and beyond. Scored against the published CLPAI methodology — seven weighted pillars, full per-firm breakdown, no pay-to-rank.
Thirteen firms covering MiCA CASP authorisation, VASP-to-CASP transition, and non-EU crypto licensing — scored on a published rubric, not a marketing brochure.
Free, no sign-up. Built on the same published methodology as the index — to help you scope a crypto-licensing project before you talk to anyone.
Answer four questions about your business and get a ranked jurisdiction shortlist, scored against the Crypto Jurisdiction Index.
Find my jurisdiction → InteractiveA 15-point self-assessment that scores how close your CASP application file is, with the gaps mapped to specific obligations.
Check my readiness → InteractiveEstimate the regulatory capital floor and the Article 67 own-funds requirement for a MiCA CASP licence class.
Estimate the cost → DataTwelve jurisdictions scored across five weighted pillars — speed, maturity, banking, cost, and reach — in one heat-map.
Open the index → InteractivePut two or three firms from the CLPAI index side by side — the seven pillar scores, jurisdictional depth, strengths, and considerations.
Compare firms →Get matched
Tell us your customer market, business model, and stage. We match it against the CLPAI ranking and email you a shortlist of crypto-licensing counsel suited to that profile — free, editorial, and not influenced by sponsorship.
Practitioner deep-dives on regulatory updates, jurisdictional comparisons, and the pitfalls that come up in real CASP files — written by editors with regulator-side and Big Four backgrounds.
CASP passport under MiCA Article 65 has been operational since late 2024. By mid-2026 cross-border passport activity is established but oper…
ana-petrova ·DORA Critical ICT Third-Party Provider (CTPP) designation went operational 2025-2026. ESAs identify CTPPs based on systemic importance to EU…
ana-petrova ·ESMA published substantial MiCA Q&A through 2025-2026 clarifying authorisation procedures, passporting mechanics, market-abuse framework, cu…
ana-petrova ·EU Travel Rule under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 (TFR) went operational 30 December 2024 alongside MiCA. By mid-2026, member-state variations …
ana-petrova ·Firms that don't take the overall #1 slot but lead a specific use case. Useful when the requirement is narrower than the full crypto-licensing problem space.
Manimama
Manimama is the volume leader of the EU crypto licensing space, with the largest claimed client base in the index and an unusually deep social-proof layer (13 LinkedIn-verified tes…
Read full review → Editor's pickFast Offshore Licenses
Fast Offshore Licenses takes the #3 slot of the CLPAI 2026.1 index — the leading firm in the index for non-EU and multi-jurisdiction crypto licensing. Its jurisdictional set is the…
Read full review → Editor's pickDilendorf Law Firm
Dilendorf Law Firm is the index's leading US-based practice with EU crypto licensing capability. Useful primarily for founders with US operations or US fundraising who need MiCA CA…
Read full review → Editor's pickCoinfirm Legal
Coinfirm Legal is the index's compliance-first specialist, useful primarily for engagements where the binding constraint is AML/CFT framework depth or sanctions-screening sophistic…
Read full review → Editor's pickBird & Bird
Bird & Bird is the index's leading Big Law generalist with a recognised crypto-asset advisory capability. The firm's overall index ranking is bounded by the methodology's emphasis …
Read full review → Editor's pickCarey Olsen
Carey Olsen is the index's leading Channel Islands and Cayman specialist with a recognised crypto-asset advisory capability. The firm scores at the bottom of the overall index beca…
Read full review →How we score
The Crypto Licensing Practice Authority Index (CLPAI) is a seven-pillar rubric we publish in full. Each firm is assessed against publicly verifiable signals — practice specialisation, jurisdictional depth, regulator-side experience, authority signals, lifecycle coverage, and transparency. Volume of clients is not a pillar; quality of regulatory engagement is.
| 1 | Practice specialisation | 20 pts |
| 2 | Jurisdictional depth | 20 pts |
| 3 | Practice-tested track record | 15 pts |
| 4 | Regulator-side experience | 10 pts |
| 5 | Authority & E-E-A-T signals | 15 pts |
| 6 | Service lifecycle coverage | 10 pts |
| 7 | Transparency | 10 pts |
The CLPAI 2026.1 ranking lists 13 crypto licensing law firms scored on a published rubric. Gofaizen & Sherle, Manimama, Fast Offshore Licenses hold the top three slots, each strong on MiCA CASP authorisation and EU jurisdictional coverage.
Firms are scored against seven weighted pillars to a total of 100: practice specialisation, jurisdictional depth, practice-tested track record, regulator-side experience, authority signals, lifecycle coverage, and transparency.
A MiCA CASP authorisation is the EU's licence under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 for crypto-asset service providers — exchanges, custody, brokerage, transfer, advisory. One authorisation passports across all 27 EU member states.
Match the firm's crypto specialisation, EU and non-EU jurisdictional coverage, and regulator-side experience to your business model. The Jurisdiction Finder and Get a Shortlist tools narrow it to a firm shortlist for your specific profile.
No. Sponsorship of the publication does not influence individual firm scores. The CLPAI methodology is published in full and the disclosure page sets out our editorial independence rules.