Crypto licensing law firms · CLPAI 2026.1

Top crypto licensing law firms — the 2026 CLPAI ranking.

The editorial ranking of 19 crypto licensing law firms and consultancies handling MiCA CASP authorisation across the EU and beyond. Scored against the published CLPAI methodology — seven weighted pillars, full per-firm breakdown, no pay-to-rank.

0 Firms ranked
0 Jurisdictions
0 Pillars
0 Review cycle

The 2026 ranking of crypto licensing law firms

Thirteen firms covering MiCA CASP authorisation, VASP-to-CASP transition, and non-EU crypto licensing — scored on a published rubric, not a marketing brochure.

Get matched

Not sure which firm fits? Get a shortlist.

Tell us your customer market, business model, and stage. We match it against the CLPAI ranking and email you a shortlist of crypto-licensing counsel suited to that profile — free, editorial, and not influenced by sponsorship.

Get my shortlist →

Named practitioners by field of practice

Full practitioners directory →

A directory of named lawyers practising in the eight fields that MiCA and the wider crypto-licensing rulebook actually touch — sourced from firm bios, directory rankings, named publications, and conference talks. Editor's Watch picks below; the full directory expands quarterly.

Peter Kerstens
★ Editor's Watch

Peter Kerstens

European Commission

European Union · MiCA CASP · Stablecoin issuance

European Commission MiCA/DORA architect steering the 2026 MiCA effectiveness review. The most direct policy signal on where the EU crypto fr…

Read profile →
Adrienne A. Harris
★ Editor's Watch

Adrienne A. Harris

New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)

United States · Non-EU crypto · Stablecoin issuance

NYDFS Superintendent operating the most rigorous US state-level crypto licence (BitLicense). Active policy voice on stablecoin reserves and …

Read profile →
Cynthia M. Lummis
★ Editor's Watch

Cynthia M. Lummis

United States Senate

United States · Stablecoin issuance · Non-EU crypto

Co-sponsor of GENIUS Act (US federal stablecoin framework) and broader US crypto-asset legislative architecture. Most prominent congressiona…

Read profile →
José Manuel Campa
★ Editor's Watch

José Manuel Campa

European Banking Authority (EBA)

European Union · Stablecoin issuance · MiCA CASP

EBA Chair coordinating EU significant CASP supervision (MiCA Article 85), ART/EMT issuer framework, and AMLA development. Critical EU regula…

Read profile →
Mark Branson
★ Editor's Watch

Mark Branson

Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)

Germany, European Union · MiCA CASP · Crypto custody

BaFin President with FINMA CEO heritage. Combined Swiss-German regulator-side perspective on crypto-asset firm supervision — most-respected …

Read profile →
Verena Ross
★ Editor's Watch

Verena Ross

European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

European Union · MiCA CASP · Stablecoin issuance

ESMA Chair leading EU-level crypto-asset market integrity supervision. Most influential regulator voice on MiCA significant CASP framework (…

Read profile →

How we score

Seven pillars, weighted to 100

The Crypto Licensing Practice Authority Index (CLPAI) is a seven-pillar rubric we publish in full. Each firm is assessed against publicly verifiable signals — practice specialisation, jurisdictional depth, regulator-side experience, authority signals, lifecycle coverage, and transparency. Volume of clients is not a pillar; quality of regulatory engagement is.

1 Practice specialisation 20 pts
2 Jurisdictional depth 20 pts
3 Practice-tested track record 15 pts
4 Regulator-side experience 10 pts
5 Authority & E-E-A-T signals 15 pts
6 Service lifecycle coverage 10 pts
7 Transparency 10 pts

Read the full methodology →

Editorial principles

  • Published rubric. The full CLPAI methodology is a public page. Any firm can audit its own score against the criteria.
  • Twice-yearly review. The index is reviewed in April and October. Firms can request corrections between reviews if material changes occur.
  • No pay-to-rank. Sponsorship of the publication does not influence individual firm scores. See our full disclosure.
  • Editor's choice. Inclusion in the index is at the editor's discretion. We do not include firms that lack substantive coverage of crypto licensing in their public materials.

Frequently asked questions

Who are the best crypto licensing law firms in 2026?

The CLPAI 2026.1 ranking lists 19 crypto licensing law firms scored on a published rubric. Gofaizen & Sherle, Manimama, Fast Offshore Licenses hold the top three slots, each strong on MiCA CASP authorisation and EU jurisdictional coverage.

How are crypto law firms ranked in the CLPAI Index?

Firms are scored against seven weighted pillars to a total of 100: practice specialisation, jurisdictional depth, practice-tested track record, regulator-side experience, authority signals, lifecycle coverage, and transparency.

What is a MiCA CASP licence?

A MiCA CASP authorisation is the EU's licence under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 for crypto-asset service providers — exchanges, custody, brokerage, transfer, advisory. One authorisation passports across all 27 EU member states.

How do I choose a crypto licensing law firm?

Match the firm's crypto specialisation, EU and non-EU jurisdictional coverage, and regulator-side experience to your business model. The Jurisdiction Finder and Get a Shortlist tools narrow it to a firm shortlist for your specific profile.

Is the Crypto Law Index ranking pay-to-rank?

No. Sponsorship of the publication does not influence individual firm scores. The CLPAI methodology is published in full and the disclosure page sets out our editorial independence rules.